Previous | Read this before cashing out your retirement account due to COVID-19 Next | Unsecured or secured loans: What's best for you?
August 17, 2020 / The Merrill Anderson Company
A GRAT in action

A GRAT in action

The Grantor-Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT) has emerged as a popular strategy in the estate planner’s toolkit. The idea is that a grantor places assets in a trust while retaining the right to receive payments from the trust. When the term of the trust expires, any assets remaining in the trust pass to a beneficiary, typically a family member.

Here’s an example of a GRAT that, unfortunately, failed. On February 1, 1998, Patricia Yoder created a Grantor-Retained Annuity Trust, keeping for herself a fixed annuity for 15 years. The annuity was set at 12.5 percent of the trust’s initial value. The trust was funded with investment real estate, and the annuity came to $302,259 per year. Although the value of the trust’s income varied from year to year, the annuity payments to Patricia did not change, and they were timely paid.
man holding money next to shield with lock icon
Patricia died November 2, 2012, three months shy of the expiration of the GRAT’s term. Her estate tax return reported a total taxable value of $36.8 million, including the value of the GRAT. Some $11.1 million in estate taxes were paid. Someone then had second thoughts and believed that including the GRAT in the taxable estate was a mistake. A refund of $3.8 million was sought, and when the IRS did not respond, the matter went to District Court.

The estate argued that a fixed annuity is not a “right to income” within the meaning of the tax code section that covers this area. An annuity is the right to receive payments from transferred property, regardless of the income earned by the property. The Court acknowledged that there is no case directly on point, but using a substance-over-form reasoning held that the estate tax does apply in this situation. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the grantor's reservation of any interest, however remote, was sufficient to bring the conveyance within the code's "possession or enjoyment" language of the tax code.

With that much money at stake, an appeal was filed with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. That Court has now affirmed the District Court decision.

Had Patricia chosen a 14-year trust term, or if she had lived just three more months, the $3.8 million tax would have been avoided.

(June 2020)
© 2020 M.A. Co. All rights reserved.
Recent Articles
What is a balance transfer — and when does it make sense?
What is a balance transfer — and when does it make sense?

What is a balance transfer — and when does it make sense?

April 08, 2021 / Cynthia Marconi

IRS extends federal tax payment deadline to May 17
IRS extends federal tax payment deadline to May 17

IRS extends federal tax payment deadline to May 17

April 02, 2021 / Shelby White

How to spot investment coaching scams
How to spot investment coaching scams

How to spot investment coaching scams

March 17, 2021 / Ray Wills

Individual investor muscle
Individual investor muscle

Individual investor muscle

March 08, 2021 / The Merrill Anderson Company

Investor alert: Robinhood app hit with hefty fine from federal regulators
Investor alert: Robinhood app hit with hefty fine from federal regulators

Investor alert: Robinhood app hit with hefty fine from federal regulators

February 23, 2021 / Shelby White

Gift values during a pandemic
Gift values during a pandemic

Gift values during a pandemic

February 16, 2021 / The Merrill Anderson Company

How to avoid the car wrap scam
How to avoid the car wrap scam

How to avoid the car wrap scam

February 10, 2021 / Ray Wills

Annual Big Game Predictor
Annual Big Game Predictor

Annual Big Game Predictor

February 05, 2021 / Warren Hurt

The three best ways to use a credit card
The three best ways to use a credit card

The three best ways to use a credit card

February 03, 2021 / Cynthia Marconi

Join our e-newsletter

Sign up for our e-newsletter to get new content each month.

NOTICE: YOU ARE LEAVING F&M TRUST!

You are now leaving the F&M Trust website. Links to third-party sites are provided for your convenience. Such sites are not within our control and may not follow the same privacy, security or accessibility standards as ours. F&M Trust neither endorses nor guarantees offerings of the third-party providers, nor is F&M Trust responsible for the security, content or availability of third-party sites, their partners or advertisers.